Fair Bargains: Distributive Justice and Nash Bargaining Theory

نویسندگان

  • Marco Mariotti
  • Vincenzo Denicolò
  • Joseph Greenberg
  • Paola Manzini
  • Herve Moulin
چکیده

the Suppes-Sen dominance relation is a weak and widely accepted criterion of distributive justice. We propose its application to Nash bargaining theory. The Nash Bargaining Solution (NBS) is characterised by replacing the controversial Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives axiom with an axiom embodying the SuppesSen principle. More precisely, maximality in the Suppes-Sen relation is shown to be equivalent to the NBS in the presence of Scale Covariance. The characterisation is far more robust than the standard one with respect to variations in the domain of bargaining problems. It is also shown that a subset of Nash’s axioms imply the Suppes-Sen relation. JEL class. number: C71, C78. I am deeply indebted, with the usual disclaimers, to Paul Madden for comments, bibliographical suggestions, encouragement, and not least for originating my interest in the Suppes-Sen relation. Useful suggestions have also come from Vincenzo Denicolò, Joseph Greenberg, Paola Manzini, Herve Moulin and Fioravante Patrone.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

ECONOMICS SERIES SWP 2009/20 Distributive Justice and Bargaining Solutions

Suppes-Sen Dominance is a commonly accepted criterion of impartiality in distributive justice. Mariotti (1999) characterized the Nash bargaining solution using Nash (1950)’s Scale Invariance (SI) axiom and an axiom named Suppes-Sen Proofness (SSP) that embodies the Suppes-Sen principle. By adding a relative equity component to SSP, we …rst consider a stronger version of of it, the Strong Suppes...

متن کامل

A Theory of Unstructured Bargaining using Distribution- Valued Solution Concepts

In experiments it is typically found that many joint utility outcomes arise in any given unstructured bargaining game. This suggests using a positive unstructured bargaining concept that maps a bargaining game to a probability distribution over outcomes rather than to a single outcome. We show how to “translate” Nash’s bargaining axioms to apply to such distributional bargaining concepts. We th...

متن کامل

رابطه ی شناخت عدالت و رفتارهای مشتری مداری در پرستاران

Introduction: Fair distribution of wage, benefits and reward also considering justice in decision making is an influential factor on nurse’s behavior toward patients and customers. The main purpose of this research was to determine relationship between perceived distributive and procedural justice, and customer-oriented behavior in nurses. Methods: This is a correlation (path analysis) cross - ...

متن کامل

Predicting Behavior in Unstructured Bargaining with a Probability Distribution

In experimental tests of human behavior in unstructured bargaining games, typically many joint utility outcomes are found to occur, not just one. This suggests we predict the outcome of such a game as a probability distribution. This is in contrast to what is conventionally done (e.g, in the Nash bargaining solution), which is predict a single outcome. We show how to translate Nash’s bargaining...

متن کامل

The Morality of Bargaining: Insights from “Caritas in Veritate”

Pope Benedict XVI’s 2009 Encyclical-Letter ‘‘Caritas in Veritate,’’ (CV) breaks some new ground in the tradition of Catholic social teaching. I argue that explicitly this document makes a call for a new theory of economic exchange. Whereas, the traditional scholastic theory of the ‘‘just price’’ was focused on ‘‘the principle of the equivalence in value of exchanged goods’’ (CV 35), a new theor...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1996